How Insurers Save Thousands on Generic Drugs Through Bulk Buying and Tendering


How Insurers Save Thousands on Generic Drugs Through Bulk Buying and Tendering
Dec, 1 2025 Pharmacy and Drugs Caspian Lockhart

Most people think generic drugs are cheap because they’re generic. But here’s the truth: bulk buying and tendering are what make them affordable at all. Insurers don’t just accept the price on the label-they fight for it. Every year, they save billions by using competitive bidding, volume deals, and smart formulary rules to drive down the cost of generic medications. And if you’re paying for insurance, you’re benefiting from it-even if you don’t realize it.

How Generics Became the Backbone of Drug Savings

Before 1984, getting a generic drug approved was a nightmare. The Hatch-Waxman Act changed that. It created a clear path for companies to copy brand-name drugs without repeating expensive clinical trials. Suddenly, multiple manufacturers could make the same pill-say, metformin for diabetes-and sell it at a fraction of the price. But here’s the catch: just having competitors doesn’t mean prices drop. That’s where bulk buying and tendering come in.

Insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) don’t buy drugs one prescription at a time. They buy in bulk-thousands, sometimes millions, of pills at once. They then invite multiple generic manufacturers to bid for the contract. The lowest bidder wins. This isn’t just a negotiation. It’s a race to the bottom, and the consumer wins.

According to the Association for Accessible Medicines, generics made up 90.7% of all prescriptions filled in the U.S. in 2023. Yet they accounted for just 17.3% of total drug spending. That gap? That’s bulk buying and tendering at work.

The Hidden Mechanics: MAC Lists, Tiered Formularies, and Spread Pricing

Behind the scenes, insurers use complex systems to control costs. One of the most powerful tools is the Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) list. This is the maximum amount an insurer will pay for a generic drug. If a pharmacy tries to charge more, the insurer pays the MAC price-and the pharmacy eats the difference.

But here’s the problem: MAC lists are often secret. Insurers don’t tell you what they’re paying. And PBMs don’t always pass the savings on. In fact, many use something called “spread pricing.” That’s when a PBM tells the insurer it paid $5 for a drug, but actually paid the pharmacy $3. The $2 difference? That’s profit. And it’s hidden from the plan sponsor.

That’s why some people pay $87 for a generic prescription through insurance-only to find out they could buy it for $5 cash at Cost Plus Drug Company. It’s not that insurance is broken. It’s that the system was built to hide how much is being made in the middle.

When Competition Works: First Generics and the $1 Billion Savings

Not all generics are created equal. The biggest savings come from first generics-the very first company to copy a brand-name drug after its patent expires. These first entrants often see prices drop by 80-90% within months.

The FDA tracked this. In 2022, just three first generics-lacosamide, pemetrexed, and bortezomib-saved the U.S. healthcare system over $1 billion each in their first year. That’s not a typo. One drug. One year. Over a billion dollars saved.

And it’s not just big drugs. Even common generics like lisinopril or atorvastatin see massive price drops when multiple manufacturers enter the market. A 2023 NIH study found that direct-to-consumer pharmacies offered median savings of 76% on expensive generics and 75% on common ones compared to traditional retail pharmacies. That’s $231 saved per prescription on the high-end stuff.

A patient between a transparent pharmacy and a shadowy PBM, with two contrasting drug prices glowing in the air.

What Happens When the Bidding Gets Too Aggressive?

There’s a dark side to this system. When insurers push prices too low, manufacturers can’t make a profit. And when they can’t make a profit, they stop making the drug.

In 2020, albuterol inhalers-a life-saving asthma medication-disappeared from shelves across the country. Why? Because the price had been bid down so far that it cost more to make than to sell. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists found that 87% of hospitals reported shortages. People couldn’t get their meds. And it wasn’t an accident. It was the direct result of unchecked tendering.

This is the tightrope insurers walk: push prices low enough to save money, but not so low that drugs vanish. The solution? More manufacturers. More competition. But here’s the scary part: just three companies now make 80% of certain generic drugs. That’s not competition. That’s a cartel waiting to happen.

Who’s Doing It Right? Transparent Models and Real Savings

Not all drug purchasing is shrouded in secrecy. Some companies are flipping the script.

Mark Cuban’s Cost Plus Drug Company sells generics at cost plus 15%. No spreads. No rebates. No hidden fees. A 2023 NIH study showed their prices were 75-91% lower than retail pharmacies. One Reddit user paid $87 through insurance for a generic. At Cost Plus? $4.99.

Blueberry Pharmacy, another transparent model, charges flat monthly rates-$15 for blood pressure meds, $10 for cholesterol pills. No surprises. No insurance maze. Over 1,200 reviews on Trustpilot give it a 4.7/5 rating. People love it because they know what they’ll pay. No guessing. No copay surprises.

Even Medicare is changing. In January 2024, CMS required PBMs to disclose pricing details for Part D plans. That’s a big deal. When insurers can see what’s really happening, they can demand better deals.

Three giant pills radiating billion-dollar halos above a crumbling factory, with a seedling of new competition growing below.

What Insurers Should Do Next

Smart insurers don’t just set a formulary and forget it. They audit it. Quarterly. They look for the drugs that are costing the most-even if they’re labeled “generic.” Often, it’s not the big names. It’s obscure pills with only one or two manufacturers. That’s where the real leverage is.

They also demand transparency in contracts. California’s Senate Bill 17 requires PBMs to disclose any spread pricing over 5%. Other states are following. Insurers should do the same. If your PBM won’t show you the real cost, find one that will.

And don’t ignore cash prices. A 2022 Schaeffer Center study found that 97% of cash payments for prescriptions were for generics. People are already voting with their wallets. Insurers need to catch up.

Why This Matters to You

If you’re on an employer plan, Medicare, or Medicaid, you’re part of this system. The savings from bulk buying and tendering keep premiums lower. They keep copays affordable. They make sure life-saving drugs are available.

But if you’re paying out of pocket, you’re being priced out of the system. That’s why tools like GoodRx, Cost Plus Drug Company, and Blink Health exist. They bypass the middlemen. They cut through the noise. And they prove that the system can work-if you know how to use it.

Next time you get a prescription, ask: Is this really the cheapest option? Could I pay cash and save half? Could my insurer be doing more? The answer might surprise you.

How do insurers save money on generic drugs?

Insurers save money by buying generic drugs in bulk and using competitive bidding-called tendering-to get the lowest possible price from multiple manufacturers. They also use Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) lists to cap reimbursement and shift high-cost generics to lower tiers on formularies. These tactics drive prices down by 80-90% compared to brand-name drugs.

What is spread pricing and why is it a problem?

Spread pricing is when a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) charges an insurer one price for a drug but pays the pharmacy less, keeping the difference as profit. This hides true costs and incentivizes PBMs to favor higher-priced generics-even when cheaper alternatives exist. It’s a major reason why some people pay more through insurance than they would by paying cash.

Are all generic drugs really cheaper than brand-name drugs?

Yes-but not always through insurance. While generics are typically 80-90% cheaper than brand-name drugs, some insurers still charge high copays for them due to formulary mismanagement. Many people find they pay less out-of-pocket using cash prices from retailers like Cost Plus Drug Company or GoodRx than they do through their insurance plan.

Why do generic drug shortages happen?

When insurers and PBMs push prices too low through aggressive tendering, manufacturers can’t cover production costs. If a drug sells for less than it costs to make, companies stop producing it. This happened with albuterol inhalers in 2020, leading to shortages at 87% of U.S. hospitals. The fix? More manufacturers and smarter pricing that doesn’t destroy margins.

Can I save money on generics without insurance?

Absolutely. Cash prices at transparent pharmacies like Cost Plus Drug Company, Blink Health, or even Walmart’s $4 list are often far lower than insurance copays. A 2023 study found that cash payments for generics saved patients an average of $19-$231 per prescription. If your insurance copay is over $20, it’s worth checking cash prices first.

What’s the difference between a PBM and an insurer?

An insurer (like Blue Cross or Aetna) provides your health coverage. A pharmacy benefit manager (PBM)-like OptumRx, Caremark, or Express Scripts-manages your drug benefits. PBMs negotiate prices with pharmacies, create formularies, and handle claims. Many PBMs are owned by insurers, creating a conflict of interest where profits come from hidden pricing practices rather than true cost savings.

How can I check if my insurer is using transparent pricing?

Ask your employer or plan administrator for a breakdown of drug pricing. Look for terms like “spread pricing,” “rebates,” or “administrative fees.” If they can’t or won’t explain how much they’re paying for your meds, they’re likely hiding it. You can also compare your insurance copay to cash prices on GoodRx or Cost Plus Drug Company. If the cash price is lower, your plan isn’t serving you well.

13 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Declan Flynn Fitness

    December 2, 2025 AT 10:38

    Big picture: this is how capitalism *should* work. More players = lower prices. The fact that we need to explain this to people is kinda sad. I’ve seen friends pay $90 for metformin through insurance, then pay $4 cash. The system’s broken, not the generics.

  • Image placeholder

    Patrick Smyth

    December 4, 2025 AT 01:05

    THIS IS WHY I HATE INSURANCE COMPANIES!!! THEY MAKE MONEY OFF YOUR SICKNESS!!! THEY DON’T CARE IF YOU CAN’T BREATH BECAUSE YOUR ALBUTEROL IS GONE!!! THEY’RE NOT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS-THEY’RE VAMPIRES IN SUITS!!!

  • Image placeholder

    Michelle Smyth

    December 4, 2025 AT 02:34

    One must interrogate the epistemological underpinnings of pharmaceutical commodification-how the neoliberal apparatus of tendering reifies health as a fungible asset, stripped of its ontological dignity. The MAC list, in its opacity, functions as a Foucauldian panopticon of pharmacological control, wherein the patient is rendered docile through the illusion of cost-efficiency. The real tragedy? We’ve internalized this violence as ‘progress.’

  • Image placeholder

    Linda Migdal

    December 5, 2025 AT 11:57

    Y’all in Europe think this is bad? Try living in a country where the government controls drug prices and you wait 6 months for insulin. At least here, we have competition-even if the PBMs are sketchy. Free markets fix this. Not more regulation.

  • Image placeholder

    Tommy Walton

    December 6, 2025 AT 21:47

    So... the system is rigged. But the fix is cash? 😏 That’s like saying democracy is broken so just vote with your wallet. Also, Mark Cuban is a genius. 🚀

  • Image placeholder

    Louise Girvan

    December 7, 2025 AT 11:12

    WHO CONTROLS THE BIDDING? WHO OWN THE PBMs? WHO FUNDS THE FDA? THIS ISN’T A ‘MARKET’-IT’S A CARTEL. THE SAME 3 COMPANIES OWN EVERYTHING. THEY’RE MAKING BILLIONS. YOU’RE JUST THE CATTLE. THEY’RE NOT ‘SAVING’ MONEY-THEY’RE STEALING IT. DON’T BELIEVE THE NARRATIVE.

  • Image placeholder

    soorya Raju

    December 8, 2025 AT 09:05

    bro u think this is bad? in india we pay $0.20 for metformin and the pharma co still makes profit bc they dont waste money on ads or lawyers. here u pay 100x for the same pill and the PBM takes 20% just for breathing. capitalism is a joke.

  • Image placeholder

    Dennis Jesuyon Balogun

    December 8, 2025 AT 10:28

    This isn't just about economics-it's about dignity. When a person has to choose between food and their blood pressure med, we've failed as a society. The market doesn't care about human life. But we can. Transparent pricing isn't a gimmick-it's a moral imperative. Let's stop pretending profit motives can coexist with care.

  • Image placeholder

    Lucinda Bresnehan

    December 8, 2025 AT 18:55

    Just wanted to say thank you for explaining spread pricing so clearly. I never realized my insurance was paying $87 for a $5 drug. I started using GoodRx last month and saved $200 on my thyroid med. Also-walmart’s $4 list is a lifesaver for seniors. 💛

  • Image placeholder

    Shannon Gabrielle

    December 10, 2025 AT 16:39

    Oh wow. A 9000 word essay on how the system works. And yet not one person mentioned the real problem: the FDA approves generics based on bioequivalence studies that are often done in China with no oversight. You’re not saving money-you’re risking your life. Congrats.

  • Image placeholder

    ANN JACOBS

    December 11, 2025 AT 15:46

    It is my profound belief that the structural inequities embedded within the contemporary pharmaceutical supply chain necessitate a paradigmatic recalibration of our collective ethical framework, wherein the commodification of essential therapeutics must be fundamentally reimagined as a public good, rather than a private profit vector. The ethical imperative to ensure equitable access to life-sustaining medications transcends market logic, and demands, at minimum, legislative intervention, institutional transparency, and a moral reckoning with the human cost of fiscal austerity in healthcare delivery.

  • Image placeholder

    Nnaemeka Kingsley

    December 11, 2025 AT 18:36

    so if i pay cash and save money, does that mean my insurance is just taking my money for nothing? lol i feel so used

  • Image placeholder

    Kshitij Shah

    December 11, 2025 AT 23:50

    haha imagine paying $87 for a $5 pill and then getting a bill for ‘administrative fees’ like you’re ordering a latte at starbucks. america: where the middleman gets rich and you get confused.

Write a comment